The U.S. comparative advantage Article Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words - 1

The U.S. comparative advantage - Article Example As part of analyzing the comparative advantage of the U.S. in terms of creating new job opportunities for the Americans, this study will identify the types and major players of solar power followed by discussing the production growth in that particular industry. Upon discussing how the improvements in solar power industry could help boost the U.S. economy, the kind of education and training that needs to be extended to Americans will be tackled in details. Prior to conclusion, the socio-economic costs associated with becoming the world’s leader in the source of solar energy will be provided. The two types of solar power are the photovoltaics (PV) – a direct source of solar energy from the sun (Knier) and the concentrating solar power (CSP) – an indirect source of solar energy which allows the sun to boil water used in generating power (Martin and Goswami, p. 45). Today, the United States has three of the world’s biggest concentrating solar thermal power stations that uses parabolic trough. These three major players of solar power in the United States includes: (1) the NextEra Energy Resources which partly operates the nine units of the Solar Energy Generating Systems located in Mojave desert California (NextEra Energy Resources); (2) Florida Power & Light Company (FPL) built the Martin Next Generation Solar Energy Center in Martin County, Florida and is expected to be completed by end of 2010 (Mayfield); and (3) a project of Acciona – Pioneers in Development and Sustainability, the construction of Nevada Solar One in Las Vegas, Nevada was completed in June 2007 (Acciona). Silicon Valley’s Sunpower Corp. together with FPL Group recently built the United States’ largest photovoltaic power plant known as the DeSoto Next Generation Solar Energy Center. This project has recently been completed back in October 2009 (FPL; SunPower). Â  

Warfare in the Napoleon era is similar to warfare practiced today Essay

Warfare in the Napoleon era is similar to warfare practiced today - Essay Example Indeed, weapon systems and technology have changed over the years with increased sophistication ; however, warlords of today still embrace and practice the fundamentals of warfare upon which the Napoleonic era thrived. The Napoleonic era inspired changes in warfare and created organizational changes in the army that increased their lethality and ignited military reform, tactics, and strategies that are currently being used today. Napoleon created corps and divisions in order to have unity of command for his large troops, which allowed him to have better command and control, and flexibility over his units; Napoleon gave his orders through established channels of command to each division. The organizational changes that were made to the French army increased their flexibility, lethality, and maneuverability in warfare, thus, making it possible for Napoleon to trounce his opponents in combat with ease. Additionally, the Army developed Brigade Combat Teams, which enhanced the organizations ability to be flexible, and agile in warfare, thus, being able to move swiftly into combat zones and taking on the opponents with remarkable success. Similarly, armies of this era are divided into divisions to facilitate unity of command and control of troops, in addition to, enhancing flexibility, lethality, and maneuverability in warfare; combat teams that are thoroughly grounded in tactics and weapon systems to undertake tec hnical missions exist today as well. Napoleon era warfare thrived on the skills and competence of the armies, thus, warlords like Napoleon ensured that their combat teams were well trained in warfare tactics and weapon technologies of their time. Additionally, warfare in this era involved logistics trains, and combined arms that were self-sustaining and dominated enemy forces throughout Europe. For instance, the 1809 Vienna campaigns was successful because the French used combined arms simultaneously, which allowed them to achieve greater impact than if each element was used separately. The French developed the logistics regiment and strictly dedicated it to supplying, and transporting equipment to units on the battlefield2, thus, ensuring the smooth undertaking of missions and operations. Armies today are highly trained in weapons and tactics of combat to be able to handle sophisticated artillery and to execute highly delicate operations with success, and warfare still relies on logistics carriages, which ensure a ste ady supply of equipment to armies in war zones, besides the simultaneous use of combined arms, like in the Napoleonic era. Napoleon’s strategy involved maintaining battles all over Europe in all the volatile areas, where enemy forces had dominated, and this ensured that the enemy forces had no time to regroup or reorganize themselves for counter attacks, thus, they were thoroughly paralyzed and defeated. Nonetheless, the French army fought on several fronts simultaneously, thereby maintaining the territory borders from all angles against the enemy forces; for instance, they fought Britain and Spain on the western front, but at the same time, they also fought Russia, Prussia, and Austria on the eastern front. In the same manner, countries today engage in and maintain battles in their enemy areas where their vulnerability lies in the attempt to neutralize enemy forces; in this regard, warfare still involves invasion and occupation of enemy territory, and such domination of